The High Court’s recent ruling in Carter-Ruck v. Solicitors Regulation Authority reinforces that regulatory necessity cannot justify nullifying clients’ legal professional privilege without clear statutory authority, offering a broader lesson for firms confronting regulatory demands that encroach on fundamental rights, says Claire Cross at Corker Binning.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BlueCrest- UK Supreme Court Clarifies “Significant Influence” Under the LLP Salaried Members Rules | 0 | 7 | 02-07-2026 |
| 2 | Veteran's mistakes did not amount to misconduct, tribunal rules | 0 | 5 | 17-06-2026 |
| 3 | UK Court of Appeal considers the FCA’s Conduct of Business (COBS) rules on client categorisation of elective professional clients | 0 | 5.1 | 06-11-2025 |
| 4 | “Exceptional circumstances”: English court upholds the FCA’s decision to announce an investigation into a named firm | 0 | 5.35 | 27-11-2025 |
| 5 | Keyboard warrior's claim against solicitor struck out | 0 | 9.07 | 04-08-2026 |
| 6 | Judges dismiss appeal to block mass claims over UK motor finance scandal | 0 | 5 | 30-06-2026 |
| 7 | Firms must come clean on secret commissions, court hears | 0 | 9.18 | 30-07-2026 |
| 8 | Regulator to appeal 'insufficiently severe' sanction imposed on bullying solicitor | 0 | 5 | 01-06-2026 |
| 9 | ‘Overworked’ solicitor cleared over allegations of sending misleading emails | 0 | 5 | 27-04-2026 |