The incident had taken place on March 13, 2015, during the tenure of the then UDF government. The Assembly witnessed unprecedented scenes when the Opposition LDF attempted to prevent the then Finance Minister K.M. Mani from presenting the Budget, leading to a confrontation of the floor of the House

File photo of the incident.
The trial in the high-profile Kerala Assembly ruckus case is set to begin on November 3, eleven years after the incident had taken place.
The trial will be conducted before the Thiruvananthapuram Chief Judicial Magistrate Court.
The incident had taken place on March 13, 2015, during the tenure of the then United Democratic Front (UDF) government. The Assembly witnessed unprecedented scenes when the Opposition Left Democratic Front (LDF) attempted to prevent the then Finance Minister K.M. Mani from presenting the Budget, leading to a confrontation of the floor of the House.
Damage to propertyAccording to the police case, the members of the Opposition allegedly entered the Speaker’s podium and damaged Assembly property, including chairs, computers, microphones and electronic panels. The case was registered by the Museum Police, with the alleged damage estimated at nearly ₹2.2 lakh.
Former Ministers V. Sivankutty, E.P. Jayarajan and K.T. Jaleel, and former MLAs K. Ajith, K. Kunhammed and C.K. Sadasivan are among the accused in the case.
In the first phase of the trial, the court will examine two witnesses including the then Assembly secretary P.D. Sarangadharan, the first prosecution witness. The prosecution has also identified an engineer, who copied the digital video recorder footage of the proceedings, as another witness.
Prolonged legal battleThe case has gone through a prolonged legal battle over whether the proceedings could be withdrawn. When the LDF was in power, the State government had approached both the Thiruvananthapuram Chief Judicial Magistrate Court and the Kerala High Court seeking withdrawal of the case. However, the petitions were not allowed. The Supreme Court also rejected the State’s appeal in 2021.
The Crime Branch subsequently completed further investigation and submitted its report within 81 days. As the further investigation did not reportedly yield any new information, the trial will proceed on the basis of the chargesheet that had already been filed.
Published - September 28, 2026 08:16 pm IST
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CPI-CPI(M) tussle over Deputy Opposition Leader post in Keralam is a mutiny against Pinarayi Vijayan | 0 | 5.74 | 26-09-2026 |
| 2 | Keralam CM bats again for zoo relocation | 0 | 9.07 | 23-09-2026 |
| 3 | CMRL-Exalogic payoff case raises legal, political challenges to govt., investigating agencies | 0 | 9.25 | 26-09-2026 |
| 4 | Keralam CM Satheesan joins the chorus of political leaders calling for the CEC’s resignation | 0 | 7.94 | 27-09-2026 |
| 5 | 40-year-old demand for road to Scheduled Caste village causes communal rift in Nilgiris | 0 | 12.04 | 27-09-2026 |
| 6 | TDB chief meets Devaswom Minister, details arrangements for Sabarimala pilgrimage | 0 | 6.72 | 25-09-2026 |
| 7 | Local body ward bypolls in Keralam see 58.81% voter turnout | 0 | 19.97 | 28-09-2026 |
| 8 | DMK says police arrested ‘Gem Granites’ Veermani because of court direction | 0 | 8.01 | 26-09-2026 |
| 9 | Union I&B clears 23 of the 31 films at IDSFFK which were earlier denied censor exemption | 0 | 12.76 | 26-09-2026 |
| 10 | 18th IDSFFK begins under a cloud of censorship | 0 | 9.91 | 25-09-2026 |