Synopsis

Tom Brady went in a different direction after his Nike deal ended. He signed with Under Armour instead. At the time, the company was much smaller and still trying to compete with the biggest names in the sportswear business.

Listen to this article in summarized format

Tom Brady left Nike for a company 20 times smaller but the money deal had an unusual catch

Tom Brady could have taken the familiar route in 2010. He was already one of the NFL’s biggest stars. Nike had supplied his apparel for years.

Brady chose a different path when his Nike contract expired. He signed with Under Armour, a far smaller challenger trying to establish itself alongside the industry’s dominant brands.

One condition made the agreement unusual. Brady wanted company equity included in the deal. He would not be paid only to wear the logo. He would also become an Under Armour shareholder.

Under Armour was only 14 years old when Brady joined the company. Sports Illustrated described the business as roughly one-twentieth the size of Nike at the time.

Brady saw an opportunity inside the size difference. Nike already had a deep roster of famous athletes. Under Armour could make Brady one of its defining stars. He became the company’s first superstar quarterback.

Brady said the younger brand felt hungry and cutting-edge. His words closely matched the public image he had built with the New England Patriots.

The agreement was not necessarily an all-stock arrangement. Contemporary reporting described it as a cash-and-stock deal.

Under Armour founder Kevin Plank confirmed that equity had been important to Brady. Reports said the stock portion would pass to him over four years. The company never publicly disclosed the exact size of his stake.

Brady also agreed to appear in advertisements. He wore Under Armour during practice and received customized cleats. The shares changed the relationship. Brady was no longer only a celebrity hired to promote clothing. His financial interests were linked to the company’s future.

Under Armour generated $1.064 billion in revenue during 2010. Nike reported $19 billion for its fiscal year. The gap showed how bold Brady’s decision looked at the time. Nike offered scale and global recognition. Under Armour offered greater room for growth.

Equity also carried real risk. A cash payment keeps its value once collected. Company shares can rise or fall.

Brady was effectively betting that his presence could help Under Armour grow while the company’s success increased the value of his compensation.

No reliable public figure answers that question. The number of shares was never disclosed. Brady’s acquisition price also remains unknown. Public reports do not reveal when he exercised options or whether he sold any shares.

Under Armour expanded rapidly after the deal. Annual revenue eventually reached $5.9 billion in fiscal 2023. The company later faced slowing sales and a steep fall from its peak market value.

Claims assigning a precise fortune to Brady’s stake should therefore be treated cautiously. The larger lesson is easier to see. Tom Brady approached the agreement like an investor. He turned his name into ownership rather than accepting only an endorsement check.

Brady joined Under Armour in 2010 after his Nike apparel contract expired.

Yes. Company founder Kevin Plank confirmed that equity formed part of the deal.

Read More News on

...moreless